首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison between sequential and simultaneous application of activated carbon with membrane bioreactor for trace organic contaminant removal
【2h】

Comparison between sequential and simultaneous application of activated carbon with membrane bioreactor for trace organic contaminant removal

机译:顺序和同时使用活性炭与膜生物反应器去除痕量有机污染物的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The removal efficiency of 22 selected trace organic contaminants by sequential application of granular activated carbon (GAC) and simultaneous application of powdered activated carbon (PAC) with membrane bioreactor (MBR) was compared in this study. Both sequential application of GAC following MBR treatment (MBR–GAC) and simultaneous application of PAC within MBR (PAC–MBR) achieved improved removal (over 95%) of seven hydrophilic and biologically persistent compounds, which were less efficiently removed by MBR-only treatment (negligible to 70%). However, gradual breakthrough of these compounds occurred over an extended operation period. Charged compounds, particularly, fenoprop and diclofenac, demonstrated the fastest breakthrough (complete and 50–70%, in MBR–GAC and PAC–MBR, respectively). Based on a simple comparison from the long-term performance stability and activated carbon usage points of view, PAC–MBR appears to be a better option than MBR–GAC treatment.
机译:在本研究中,比较了通过顺序应用颗粒状活性炭(GAC)和同时使用粉状活性炭(PAC)与膜生物反应器(MBR)去除22种选定的痕量有机污染物的效率。在MBR处理后顺序应用GAC(MBR–GAC)和在MBR内同时应用PAC(PAC–MBR)均可实现对7种亲水性和生物持久性化合物的去除率提高(超过95%),而仅使用MBR去除效率较低治疗(可忽略不计70%)。但是,这些化合物在较长的使用期内逐渐突破。带电荷的化合物,特别是芬诺丙和双氯芬酸,表现出最快的突破(分别在MBR-GAC和PAC-MBR中分别达到50%和70%)。从长期性能稳定性和活性炭用量的角度进行简单比较,PAC-MBR似乎比MBR-GAC处理更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号